Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Baird v. Norwest Bank

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1992No. 91-224Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

JUSTICE HUNT, joined by JUSTICE TRIEWEILER,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with the majority’s decision regarding Issues I, IV, V, and VI.

However, I dissent with the majority’s decision regarding Issues II, III, and VIII because I believe it disturbs the jury’s fact-finding process. This Court has continuously upheld the fundamental proposition that the jury is entrusted with the responsibility of seeking the truth. Because of our high regard for the jury deliberation process, we have established an exacting standard of review when examining a jury’s verdict.

Motions to set…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barmeyer v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Lackey v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Walker v. MinkMontana Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API