Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland Heights v. Spellman

City of Cleveland Municipal Court

Decided December 11, 1965No. 35774PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZingales, J.

(by re-assignment). Gentlemen, this court has reached a decision in this matter.

*150It may appear to counsel here this morning, that this fact may seem spontaneous and somewhat brazen, especially so since immediately upon completion of respective counsel’s argument, this court commences to read a written decision which was obviously prepared prior to this commencement of your said arguments made here this morning. I ask that you dispell that thought, if it exists at all, and any thought which you may have to the effect that your time spent here today was in vain or wasted because that is not the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Dumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Poldo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. Nicholas v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Charles A. Tabasko, Jr. v. Bernard I. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  2. State v. Dibble (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Swartz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. State v. MischLake County Court of Common Pleas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API