Legal Opinion

Bechtel Jewelers, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 30, 1984No. Nos. 64023, 64022PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, Justice.

This cause is before us pursuant to a certified question from the Fourth District Court of Appeal:

IF A MARY CARTER AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO AND NONPARTICIPATING DEFENDANTS REQUEST THAT THE JURY BE SO ADVISED, MUST THE ENTIRE AGREEMENT ALWAYS BE PUT IN EVIDENCE.

Insurance Co. of North America v. Sloan, 432 So.2d 132, 135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We have jurisdiction. Art. V., § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

Sloan left her sapphire ring with McCabe, a jeweler, for an appraisal. McCabe sent it to Bechtel, a gemologist, to verify its authenticity. Bechtel put the ring in an ultrasonic machine to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. OchoaSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. SloanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dosdourian v. CarstenSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. DIAZ BY RIVAS v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API