Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Oklahoma City v. Leonard

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 9, 1988No. S-87-459Published

1DissentParks, Judge

I dissent. Assuming the City of Oklahoma City, appellant, is properly before this Court on a reserved question of law as claimed in the brief filed on its behalf, it is well established that retrial is barred following appeal on a reserved question of law:

The 22 O.S. [1981], § 1053 procedure for appealing on a reserved question of law applies only to review following a judgment of acquittal for the defendant or an order of the court authorized by law as an express bar to further prosecution, (citations omitted)

State v. Ogden, 628 P.2d 1167, 1169 (Okl. Crim.App.1981). The fact of the matter is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. OgdenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. MacY v. JacksonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Worthen v. WalkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API