Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State ex rel. Allen v. Taylor

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 10, 1972No. Q-423Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRawls, Judge

I concur with the opinion of my brother Spector from its beginning down to the paragraph which reads:

“Although we have concluded that neither the reason stated by the trial court in its order denying discharge nor the argumentation advanced by the respondent’s counsel on appeal are valid grounds for denying petitioner’s motion for discharge, there does exist a reason or ground based on which we must hold that the order reviewed herein is correct.”

From this point to the end of Judge Spec-tor’s opinion, I must part from his company.

The “reason” mentioned is an illusory one. Rule 3.191 (i) (2),…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Edell v. BlountDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API