Legal Opinion

Russell v. Baugh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 1953No. 35546PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

O’NEAL, Justice.

In this action R. E. Russell sought to recover an undivided one-half interest in the surface rights and an undivided ¾6& interest in the mineral rights in 120 acres of land in Pontotoc County, Oklahoma. In the trial court judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant and from the order overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

The parties appear here in the same position as in the court below.

Plaintiff, R. E. Russell and Lou Baugh were married in December, 1926. Lou Baugh had been previously married and the defendant, Coy Baugh, is the son of Lou by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Travis v. McCullySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. O'NEAL v. UptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Clements v. MeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dowell v. McNeillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API