Kidd v. Condry
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtPortrum, J.
William Horace Kidd brought this action against W. M. Condry to recover payments made on a 1937 Plymouth automobile purchased from Condry basing his action upon a noneom-pliance with section 7291 of the Code in failing to advertise and sell the. car within ten days under the method directed by the statute. The case was heard by a jury and a verdict rendered in favor of the defendant, and an order entered dismissing the suit. The case is here for a review.
It is first insisted that there is no evidence to support the verdict and the trial judge erred in failing to grant the plaintiff’s motion…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Murray v. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Rice v. Lusky Furniture Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Shanks v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- B a C Corporation v. FrancisTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
- Dillard v. Ball Bros., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mallicoat v. Volunteer Finance & Loan Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
- Investors Acceptance Co. of Livingston v. James Talcott, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- Williams v. BridgefordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- Pack v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
- Judd v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956