Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Irvine

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 10, 1802PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Upon an appeal from a decree of the Bardstown District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*197In this cause, very contradictory testimony has been adduced concerning a small spring and tree marked T D, which are called for in Aiken’s entry, who was complainant in the court below. But it is not necessary to decide on this testimony until it shall be found that the entry does in other respects comply with the requisitions of the law. The entry is as followeth: “Joseph Aiken enters 500 acres upon a treasury warrant, on the waters of Hardin’s creek, about two or three miles from Thomas Denton’s camp, called the hunting camp, to include a small spring on the east side of the north fork of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API