Legal Opinion

Sell v. Compton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1913No. 18,526PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Wilson district court; James W. Finley, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*152The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

Sell traded his farm to Compton for a stock of goods. The goods were priced higher than the farm, and Sell gave Compton a note secured by a chattel mortgage on the goods for the difference. The goods were in a store conducted by Compton at Lehigh. Sell undertook to continue the business, and contracted to keep an accurate account of the goods sold and to de- ’ posit sixty-five per cent of the proceeds in the bank at Lehigh, to be credited on the note until it should be paid. Sell took possession of the store' on January 29, 1912, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Provident Loan Trust Co. v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Bell v. KeepersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Neal v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Basye v. Paola Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cleaves v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Bankers Mortgage Co. v. RobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Thompson v. MillikinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Van Natta v. SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Dodd v. BolesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API