Legal Opinion

M.W. v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 30, 2003No. Nos. 2D0-1994, 2D02-1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHATLEY, Judge.

In this appeal of an order terminating their parental rights, both parents contend that the trial court erred in reopening the case after the parties had rested. We agree and reverse.

The trial in this matter began on December 5, 2001, and, because the guardian was not available to testify on that date, it was continued until January 29, 2002. After testimony was taken on January 29, both parties rested and the trial court announced, “So end of case. Under advisement. I will have to dig through all of this and review my prior notes and then *582decide what I am going to do.”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lyles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Fitzhugh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Kirkpatrick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DiGiovanni v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM vs J.J., FATHER OF E.J., AND C.J., CHILDRENDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API