Legal Opinion
Coutu v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided December 3, 2019No. 3:17-cv-01492Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BERNARD COUTU, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:17-cv-01492 v. ) ) JUDGE CAMPBELL BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC. and ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE NEWBERN BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE ) OPERATIONS, LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 58). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. No. 61) and Defendants’ filed a reply (Doc. No. 66). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion is DENIED. Plaintiff brings this case…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.