Legal Opinion

Walker v. Teal

United States Circuit Court

Decided January 10, 1881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action at law to recover damages.

1Opinion of the Court

Deady, D. J.

The plaintiff, a British subject, brings this action to recover $16,000 damages, alleged to have been sustained by him on account of the refusal of the defendant, a citizen of Oregon, to deliver to him the possession of certain real property in Oregon, and wrongfully withholding the same from the plaintiff from July 6, 1877, to November 30, 1878, to-wit: the S. J of lots 2 and 7 in block 38, and the undivided J of the N. ¿-.of lot 6, and the undivided J of the S. J of lot 7, in block 2 in the city of Portland, from which the defendant received rents during said period at the rate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Townsend v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Ungles v. GravesIndiana Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Teal v. WalkerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API