Legal Opinion

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Rogers

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 7, 2015Published

1Opinion of the CourtSingh, J.

Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) brought this action to evict defendant Gary P. Rogers (“Rogers”) from his Malden home of nearly fifty years. Fannie Mae asserted that it had obtained legal title to the property after foreclosure sale and that Rogers had faffed to vacate after notice to quit. Rogers contended that the foreclosure sale was void and that Fannie Mae had violated the consumer protection law (G.L.c. 93A) by failing to provide him with a loan modification under the Federal Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”). Upon Fannie Mae’s motion for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. SchumacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. HendricksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Galiastro v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  5. Bank of America, N.A. v. RosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API