People v. Matulis
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nash
The State appeals from a judgment of the circuit court dismissing an implied consent hearing, which had been requested by defendant, Vincas Matulis, on the grounds that the statement of the arresting officer required by section 11 — 501.1(d) of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 95^2, par. 11 — 501.1(d)) was not sworn to by the officer.
Officer Pat O’Brien testified at the hearing that at 2 a.m. on December 31, 1981, he was on patrol in the city of Lisle and observed a Ford Pinto in the parking lot of Riedy’s Hardware Store. The doors of the car were locked, its headlights on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Illinois v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. SchuberthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Village of Park Forest v. AngelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- People v. MalloyIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. RehfeldtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BadoudIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. GaddiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- People v. HorbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- People v. KaegebeinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- People v. Di CostanzoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985