Legal Opinion

Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 24, 1941No. 9701PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

Reversal of a decree adjudicating that the taking by appellee of certain properties belonging to Puget Sound Power & Light Company is a “public necessity” and for a “public use”, and reversal of a judgment of $5,000,000 found by the jury to be just compensation for the taking, are sought by appellants.

Establishment of public utility districts to conserve the water and power resources of the State of Washington for the benefit of the people thereof, and to supply public utility service, including water and electricity for all uses is authorized by 11 Rem.Rev.Statutes of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Seattle & Montana Railroad v. RoederWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Carstens v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Washington Water Power Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sultan Water & Power Co. v. Weyerhauser Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Weber v. West Seattle Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  3. Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County v. United States of America, Inland Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. In re the Valuation Proceedings under Sections 303(c) & 306Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. N.W. Etc. v. S. Ct.Washington Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API