Panama Transport Co. v. The Maravi
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
With the exception of one witness (Stanley, a consulting engineer and marine surveyor, who testified as an expert as to hydraulic telemotor systems and their breakdowns), the testimony was all by deposition. Accordingly, we are, with respect to most of the facts, in as good a position to determine what happened as was the trial judge, and therefore the usual “unless clearly erroneous” test does not apply to the judge’s findings. Nevertheless, they are, of course, entitled to great respect. Having carefully considered them, we accept them. His version of what occurred is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- The PhoebusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grace Line, Inc. v. United States Lines Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Bertel v. Panama Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Paco Tankers, Inc. v. The RodasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Anglo-American Oil Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951