Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Davis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1949No. 30664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

The executor of a decedent’s will, and the state of Washington, acting through the inheritance tax and escheat division of the state tax commission, have each appealed from the final decree of distribution entered by the superior court for King county, sitting in probate. The question presented to us in both appeals involves the interpretation of the residuary clause of the will. The facts in the case are not in dispute.

Charles Lidston, who will hereinafter at times be referred to as the decedent or as testator, was a bachelor residing in Seattle, Washington. On April 12, 1945, he executed an…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Law v. DouglassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. In Re Elliott's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. In Re Phillips' EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. In re Will of TinsleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Lidston's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API