Legal Opinion

State v. Harrell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1990No. 903SC26PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in basing its sentencing decision in part upon the fact defendant denied all guilt with respect to the charges. We agree with defendant’s contention and remand for resentencing.

The trial court found one statutory aggravating factor for two of the charges, a prior conviction for a criminal offense punishable by more than sixty days confinement. In addition, the trial court found as a nonstatutory aggravating factor for these two charges that “[t]he defendant gave no substantial assistance to law enforcement.” Later in corrected findings…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API