Legal Opinion

Kersting v. City of Ferguson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 12, 1965No. 50888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Commissioner.

The question which is of primary concern here is whether there is presented a constitutional question necessary to vest this court with appellate jurisdiction.

Appellants’ first amended petition alleges in both Counts I and II thereof that they are representatives of a class of resident taxpayers and property owners in Ferguson, Missouri. In Count I of the petition it is alleged that the Charter of the City of Ferguson is void in toto because it is violative of the 1945 Constitution of Missouri, and further that certain specified sections of the Charter are individually…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Cohen v. EnnisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Gennari v. Norwood Hills CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Goodson v. City of FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Cohen v. EnnisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. McCluneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Kersting v. City of FergusonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Missouri Utilities Co. v. Scott-New Madrid-Mississippi Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. WigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. WigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API