Legal Opinion

McHugh v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 7, 1975No. 50913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

The basis of this appeal from the conviction of criminal attempt to commit burglary is the contended material, hence fatal, variance between the allegation in the indictment of an "attempt to force door open causing burglar alarm to sound on the office of Dr. Clyde Harrison” and proof that the alarm was activated by an attempt to knock in a window.

" 'In criminal law an unnecessarily minute description of a necessary fact must be proved as charged; but an unnecessary description of an unnecessary fact need not be proved.’ Hall v. State, 120 Ga. 142 (1) (47 SE 519).” Bell v. State,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. De Palma v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  4. Marchman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Caldwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Hufstetler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. McCarty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Alexander v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API