United States v. Jose Alberto Ugarte-Veizaga
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 409 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1969), and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 417 F.2d 526 (5 Cir. 1969).
After going through customs in the Miami Airport, appellant was searched-by customs officials who discovered a quantity of cocaine in a concealed belt around his waist. He was indicted for illegally importing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Lowell Lyons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Howard C. Good v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jose Alberto Ugarte-Veizaga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Jose Alberto Ugarte-Veizaga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972