Legal Opinion
Pearlstein v. Blackberry Limited
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 29, 2022No. 1:13-cv-07060Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OCSMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ee LEY EILED | LE oe <a MARVIN PEARLSTEIN, Individually And On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, No. 13 Civ. 7060 (CM) (KHP) (Consolidated) -against- MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BLACKBERRY LIMITED (formerly known as RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED), THORSTEN HEINS, BRIAN BIDULKA, and STEVE ZIPPERSTEIN, Defendants. Colleen McMahon, Senior United States District Judge: In accordance with Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Todd Cox and Mary Dinzik move for final approval of a settlement…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.