Legal Opinion

Gillmore v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 7, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Eugene E. Gillmore, by Harry Gillmore, his guardian ad litem, against the Interborough Rapid Transit Company. From a Municipal Court judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

Plaintiff was a passenger upon a north-bouna Sixth Avenue elevated train. At Fourteenth street he went to the door of the car, which he testifies was already open. He did not see who opened it. He testified:

“I was just about going out, when the car stopped' suddenly, and I had to grab on the jamb of the door. As I grabbed the jamb, the door loosened its fastening from underneath, and the door slammed, and I had my finger there, and the finger was jammed.”

The plaintiff was uncorroborated, and this is the only evidence of negligence on the part of defendant in the case. Such testimony has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Needham v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
  2. Muller v. Manhattan Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
  3. Needham v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodriguez v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API