Legal Opinion

Howard Hardy & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 3, 1937No. 4041Published

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Appellant imported from England and exported to England 133 pieces of woolen piece goods and claimed drawback under and by virtue of the provisions of section 313, Tariff Act of 1930, for the reason that prior to exportation of the merchandise the same had gone through a process known as “Imperial finishing.”

The Collector of Customs denied drawback and the United States Customs Court overruled appellant’s protest against said denial on the part of the collector. From the judgment of the trial court, appellant has here appealed.

The pertinent provisions of said section 313, Tariff Act of 1930,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Austin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. United States v. American Railway Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API