Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Pollack

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 4, 1958No. 57-212PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

Appellant, as plaintiff, sought enforcement of a lien against the owners of the fee, for architectural services rendered to a a lessee. See Sections 84.02, 84.03(2) Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Although the complaint alleges that the land was cleared, the property staked out, and a sign erected by the lessee, no work was undertaken pursuant to the plans prepared by plaintiff. Upon motion for summary final decree by defendant it conclusively appeared that the lease in question was never delivered. During the period in which plaintiff’s work was performed, the prospective lessee and lessor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brenner v. SmullianSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Houston v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  3. The Masterbilt Corporation v. S. A. Ryan Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. Bould v. CoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. Lee v. SasSupreme Court of Florida · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zell v. CobbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Amatrudi v. BlakeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Haas v. KipnisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Rice v. RiceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API