Legal Opinion

Render v. Dodson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1936No. 27134PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

A motion to dismiss has been filed in this cause for the reason that the certificate of the court clerk does not purport to present a transcript of the record.

We are of the opinion that the case must be dismissed under the rule announced many times by this court. See Wade v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; Champion Oil Co. v. Burke, 90 Okla. 33, 215 P. 756. It is true the clerk certified that it is a full, true, correct, and complete copy of certain instruments, and sets out ten instruments.

The court cannot presume, or judicially know, that this is all of record unless the clerk’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wade v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  2. Champion Oil Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hunter v. PepisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Hudson v. GilbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Local Union Textile Workers No. 1840 v. Commander Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Henderson v. Atlas Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API