Legal Opinion

Stradford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1990No. 56759PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

A jury convicted movant of first degree assault; he failed to appear for sentencing and pursuant to an arrest warrant was apprehended roughly one month later. Upon being placed in the county jail, mov-ant escaped, but was again apprehended. The trial court sentenced him to a fifteen year prison term. Movant filed a notice of appeal, but later voluntarily dismissed his direct appeal.

In his pro se and amended Rule 29.15 motions, movant made various claims of ineffective assistance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Estelle v. DorroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Allen v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Commonwealth v. AndrewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  5. State v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp. v. BillmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Wesbecher v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. BranchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Hicks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API