Legal Opinion

Matlock v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of Mobile. Tried before the Hon. John Bragg.

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, J.

This suit, in which the defendants in error were plaintiffs below, was commenced and prosecuted under the act “ to provide a more efficient remedy in cases of unlawful entry and detainer in the city of Mobile,” approved March 3, 1848. The plaintiffs below recovered before the justices of *601the peace against Matlock alone, and he brought the cause to the Circuit Court of Mobile by certiorari, where there was a trial de novo on the merits, according to the statute, without any objection to the complaint, process, or other proceedings before the justice. The defendant below might have demurred,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Kline v. RickertNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. People ex rel. Brinkerhoff v. NelsonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  3. Wright v. LyleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  4. Huffaker v. BoringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Welden v. SchlosserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Flake v. Day & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. Sprouse v. StorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API