State v. O'CONNOR
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Kevin O’Connor appeals his convictions, by bench trial on stipulated facts, of possession of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver. He contends that the two crimes merged and that the convictions, following a civil forfeiture proceeding, violated double jeopardy. Holding that the two convictions were for the same offense and constituted double jeopardy, but that O’Connor failed to show the civil forfeiture was so punitive as to equal a criminal proceeding, we affirm the conviction for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. PortreyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.