Legal Opinion

Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1886Published

1Opinion of the CourtBlandford, J.

A constable cannot protect himself against a rule ■brought against him for not making the money due on a fi. fa. placed in his hands, on the ground that the execution did not follow the judgment under which it issued. It is the duty of a ministerial officer to ■execute every process placed in his hands which is regular and proper •on its face and which is issued by a person having authority to do so; and the fact that it may be avoidable because it does not follow the judgement, is no defense to him for failing to make the money thereunder. 19 Ga., 139, 268; Gladden, sheriff vs. Cobb. (Sept.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jordan v. PorterfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API