Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 27, 2017No. 16-3373PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

A person may commit the federal crime of bank robbery “by force and violence, or by intimidation.” 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The issue in this appeal is whether the federal offense of bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) qualifies as a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). We hold that it does. We have held that the so-called “residual clause” in the § 924(c) definition of a crime of violence is unconstitutionally vague, United States v. Cardena, 842 F.3d 959, 996 (7th Cir. 2016), but even bank robbery fits easily into the “elements clause” of the definition of a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. United States v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Elonis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Stacy HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Jonathan PetrasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API