Legal Opinion
People v. Hernandez
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 1992No. E009831PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DABNEY, J.
Following the denial of his nonstatutory motions to dismiss on speedy trial grounds and for the failure to insure the availability of a material witness (see People v. Mejia (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 574 [129 Cal.Rptr. 192]), defendant and appellant Sal Orozco Hernandez entered a plea of guilty to the charge of manufacturing a controlled substance, to wit, methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379.6, subd. (a).) On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in denying these motions. We agree with the People that the issues did not survive the entry of defendant’s guilty…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. KaaneheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Townsend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. EgbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- RICKI J. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. Cisneros-Ramirez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. AguilarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.