Legal Opinion
Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Chemical Lime, Ltd.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 2009No. 06-0911Published
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
════════════
No. 06-0911
════════════
Edwards Aquifer Authority et al., Petitioners,
v.
Chemical Lime, Ltd., Respondent
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
On Petition for Review from the
Court of Appeals for the Third District of Texas
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Argued April 1, 2008
2ConcurrenceJustice Brister
It has been said that “any law student, after a month in law school, knows that the answer to the question ‘Define X,’ is: ‘For what purpose are we defining this term?’”[1] In this case, we must define “take effect” for the…
3Cases cited50 opinions
- State v. CullenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- University of Texas Medical School at Houston v. ThanTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.