Legal Opinion
Carter v. Georgevich
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 5, 2000No. Civil A. 96-1990 (WHW)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
Defendant Steven Georgevich moves to dismiss the plaintiff Cornelius Carter’s complaint. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court decides this motion without oral argument. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is denied.
Background
In 1991, Steven Georgevich, a police officer in Bergen County, pulled over plaintiff for driving erratically on the highway. As the car slowed, and when defendant later questioned plaintiff at the rear of the car, Officer Georgevich observed the front seat passenger making what he describes as “furtive…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eugene Hector v. Gordon J. Watt Alberto Diaz Richard Davy Scott Hunter, in Their Individual and Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Eugene Hector v. Gordon J. Watt Alberto Diaz Richard Davy Scott Hunter, in Their Individual and Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Eugene Hector v. Gordon J. Watt Alberto Diaz Richard Davy Scott Hunter, in Their Individual and Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Hector v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000