Legal Opinion
Amarante v. Rothschild
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Jacinta Batista d/b/a Quisqueya Grocery, Redfern Meat & Poultry and Redfern Meats, and Jay Rothschild a/k/a J. Rothchino and Jay Rothschild Special, Inc., separately appeal from so much of an order *634of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), dated July 28, 1989, as denied the defendant Batista’s motion and the defendant Rothschild’s cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against each of them. The plaintiffs cross-appeal from so much…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Bovsun v. SanperiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- De Angelis v. Lutheran Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Waters v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fontaine v. RyanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Hechmeh v. 18th Avenue Custom Jewelry Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Varghese v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999