Legal Opinion
Southern Colonization Co. v. Howard Cole & Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
Sec. 2832, Stats., pursuant to the terms of which the trial court acted, provides that—
“The court or a judge may likewise in discretion and upon such terms as may he just, at any time within one year after notice thereof, relieve a party from a judgment, order, stipulation or other proceeding against him, through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect.”
On behalf of the plaintiff it is contended (1) that the writing in question is not a mere stipulation but a binding contract, and that therefore the court had no power to set it aside under the provisions of sec. 2832; (2)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Illinois Steel Co. v. WarrasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Walters v. EakinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kocinski v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Northern Supply Co. v. Town of GreybullWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Thayer v. Federal Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Paine v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Burke v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.