Legal Opinion

Southern Colonization Co. v. Howard Cole & Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

Sec. 2832, Stats., pursuant to the terms of which the trial court acted, provides that—

“The court or a judge may likewise in discretion and upon such terms as may he just, at any time within one year after notice thereof, relieve a party from a judgment, order, stipulation or other proceeding against him, through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect.”

On behalf of the plaintiff it is contended (1) that the writing in question is not a mere stipulation but a binding contract, and that therefore the court had no power to set it aside under the provisions of sec. 2832; (2)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. WarrasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Walters v. EakinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kocinski v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Northern Supply Co. v. Town of GreybullWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Thayer v. Federal Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Paine v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Burke v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API