Legal Opinion

Corlin v. City of Worcester

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided September 14, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTeahan, J.

This matter comes before us on expedited appeal under Rule 8A of the Dist/Mun. Cts. RADA It arises out of allowance of summary judgment for the defendant There were no disputed facts before the judge entering summary judgment

The plaintiff fell on a sidewalk in Worcester due to a protruding water shutoff extending one inch above the surface. Worcester police responded as did water department employees. Notice was sent to the Worcester Law Department. The facts being undisputed, the motion judge entered judgment for the defendant We affirm.

Notwithstanding the more general language in Ch. 84,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Merrill v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Burdette v. City of BostonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estabrook v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API