Legal Opinion

Transplace Stuttgart, Inc. v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 25, 2007No. CA 06-711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brian S. Miller, Judge.

Transplace Stuttgart, Inc. appeals a March 15, 2006, Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission opinion finding Transplace to be the statutory employer of appellee Marty Carter, who sustained compensable injures on September 3, 2004, while employed by appellee C-Claw, Inc. The Commission held that C-Claw was Transplace’s uninsured subcontractor. Transplace was therefore liable for Carter’s workers’ compensation benefits. Transplace claims that the Commission’s opinion was not supported by substantial evidence because Transplace is a transportation broker and not C-Claw’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Ellison v. Therma-TruCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Avaya v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Wren v. Sanders Plumbing SupplyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Lofton v. BryanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. Agar Livestock, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Mamo Transportation, Inc. v. Director, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Mamo Transportation, Inc. v. Director, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API