Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Fenimore

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1989No. 88CA0965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge RULAND.

William E. Fenimore (husband) appeals from those provisions of the permanent orders which address the vested survivor benefit payable to Mary P. Fenimore (wife) from his Civil Service Employee Pension Plan. We affirm.

The marriage of husband and wife was dissolved after approximately 32 years. At the time of the hearing on permanent orders, husband was retired and was receiving $3,248 in monthly gross income from his pension. While the case was pending in the trial court for decision, In re Marriage of Grubb, 745 P.2d 661 (Colo.1987) and In re Marriage of Nelson, 746…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of GrubbSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. In Re the Marriage of JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. In Re the Marriage of PriceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. In Re the Marriage of NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. In Re the Marriage of GerckenColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BlakeColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re the Marriage of HuntColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. In Re the Marriage of PayneColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. In re the Marriage of SinkovichColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. In Re the Marriage of HuntColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API