Legal Opinion
Putchlawski v. Diaz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 22, 1993PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered March 23, 1992, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of defendants, dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The trial court did not err in refusing to preclude the *445testimony of defendants’ expert pathologist because of defendants’ failure to disclose her identity and the subject matter of her testimony prior to trial. 22 NYCRR 202.17 (h), which necessarily entails disclosure of the identity of medical experts insofar as it requires an exchange of their reports, does not apply to medical experts, like…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SalaamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Gamell v. Mount Sinai HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Campoli v. LobmeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Gamell v. Mount Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
3Cited by12 opinions
- Citron v. Northern Dutchess HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Estate of BuchananAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Gilbert v. LuvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Hudson v. Lansingburgh Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Stevens v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.