Legal Opinion

D'Wolf v. Harris

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided October 15, 1827No. Case No. 4,221PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOBY, Circuit Justice,

in summing up the case, said: This is an action of replevin for twenty-three cases of silks, valued at $6000. The defendant, who is the marshal of this district, has pleaded, first, non eepit; and, secondly, that the goods in question are the property of one George D’Wolf, and not of the plaintiff, and he makes an avow-ry for a return, stating, that the goods were attached by him, as marshal of the district, as the property of George D’Wolf, in a suit brought against him in behalf of the United States. Issue is joined between the parties upon both pleas.

The nature of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hart v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. President of the Portland Bank v. StubbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  3. Sturtevant v. BallardNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  4. Bissell v. HopkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  5. Gardner v. DutchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1837
  2. Wright v. BennettNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Cushing v. MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1883
  4. Brinley v. SpringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1831
  5. Lord v. FergusonSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1838

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API