Legal Opinion

Waste Management & Transportation Insurance v. Estridge

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 2004No. CA 04-1241Published

1Opinion of the Court

200 S.W.3d 453 (2004)

WASTE MANAGEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellants

v.

Jack ESTRIDGE, Appellee.

No. CA 04-1241.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, En Banc.

December 15, 2004.

2Per curiam

Motion for Rule on the Clerk is denied.

3DissentSam Bird, Judge

Appellants, Waste Management and Transportation Insurance Company, have filed a motion for rule on the clerk, seeking an order directing the clerk to docket the record tendered in connection with this appeal. The facts giving rise to this motion are certainly unique and, considering the state of the law, I can understand that there would be a difference of opinion as to…

4Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. C & M TRACTOR CO.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  2. West v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Evans v. Northwest Tire ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Morris v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Novak v. J.B. Hunt TransportCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API