Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gem Oil Co. v. Swift

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1924No. 11920Published

1Opinion of the CourtMeNEILL, J.

This action was commenced by George M. Swift and L. O. Lytle against the Gem Oil Company and Charles Page to recover certain royalties alleged to be due under an oil and gas lease.

The material facts as admitted, or offered to be proven, may be stated as fol-. lows: Tommy Atkins was allotted the land where the oil is produced, and on his death the same was inherited by Minnie Atkins. Charles Page and the Gem Oil Company developed the land under an oil lease exe-' euted by Minnie Atkins and others, and first produced oil about July, 1914. The TJ. S. Government had brought suit to cancel the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Edmonds v. MounseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Kimbriel v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API