Legal Opinion

Doe v. Gonzalez

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 31, 1988No. 85-8452-CIVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROETTGER, District Judge.

The legal issue for determination by the Court in the instant case is whether Section 112.317(6), Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional on its face or as applied to Plaintiff. Section 112,317(6) of the Florida Statutes provides in pertinent part:

Any person who willfully discloses, or permits to be disclosed, his intention to file a complaint, the existence or contents of a complaint which has been filed with the Commission, or any document, action or proceeding in connection with a confidential preliminary investigation of the Commission, before…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Epperson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stilp v. ContinoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Doe v. Supreme Court of FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
  3. Florida Bar re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. Stilp v. ContinoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Reiter v. MasonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API