Legal Opinion

Chochrek v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 13, 1975No. 86609PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Petitioner, an inmate at the Oregon State Penitentiary, instituted this habeas corpus proceeding contending violation of constitutional rights in three particulars: (1) denial of access to the courts; (2) denial of the right to vote while an inmate; and (3) an inadequate hearing preceding termination of his participation in a school-release program. The trial court ruled against him in all particulars.

The petition for a writ alleged that the petitioner was denied access to the courts by being denied suf*3ficiently frequent access to the prison law library. The petition did not allege that other…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Richardson v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Younger v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Gilmore v. LynchDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bekins v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Fadeley v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Rutherford v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Goodin v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Rutherford v. Oregon State PenitentiaryOregon Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API