Legal Opinion

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Shenzhen Usource Technology Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 21, 2021No. 5:20-cv-04773Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-04773-EJD 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND 10 v. ISSUANCE OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION 11 SHENZHEN USOURCE TECHNOLOGY CO., et al., 12 Re: Dkt. No. 58 Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiffs Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Technology, Inc., (together, “Cisco”) and Ciena 15 Corporation (“Ciena”) filed this action asserting trademark infringement and counterfeiting against 16 Defendants Shenzhen Usource Technology Co., Warex Technologies Limited, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API