Legal Opinion
Ward v. Flex-O-Tube Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 10, 1953No. Civ. A. 10289PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs are citizens of Michigan. Both defendants are foreign corporations. For some years the plaintiffs each owned half of the outstanding shares of the capital -stock of the defendant Harturn, Inc., then known under another name. Early in 1945 the plaintiffs granted an option to a third party to purchase their stock, which option was exercised, and the interest thus acquired was, on September 15, 1945, assigned by such third party to the defendant Flex-O-Tube Company, then also known under another name.
On September 15, 1943, the defendant Harturn, Inc. filed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shannon v. Shaffer Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- De Vries v. Meyering Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Hicks v. CaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Curtis v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by1 opinion
- John L. Ward and Richard De Tamble v. Flex-O-Tube Company and Harturn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954