Legal Opinion

Rogers v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 13, 2003No. S02A1310PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

Appellant James Rogers challenges the trial court’s order finding that he waived his request for a jury trial on the issue of mental retardation pursuant to Fleming v. Zant, 259 Ga. 687 (386 SE2d 339) (1989). Because we hold that a defendant who was tried for a capital crime prior to July 1, 1988 cannot waive his request for a hearing to determine whether he is mentally retarded once a court finds sufficient credible evidence of mental retardation to create an issue for a jury, we reverse and remand to the trial court.

1. Rogers was convicted and sentenced to death for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Fleming v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Devier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Mason, L., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  4. Hughey v. Gwinnett CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  5. Conner v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API