Pezzella v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We reverse appellant’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance on the ground that the comment by a prosecution witness on the accused’s right to remain silent, to which defense counsel objected and moved for a mistrial, impermissibly prejudiced appellant’s right to a fair trial. Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978); Willinsky v. State, 360 So.2d 760 (Fla.1978); Shannon v. State, 335 So.2d 5 (Fla.1976); Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41 (Fla.1975); Marshall v. State, 393 So.2d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Harris v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Willinsky v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.