Killion v. City of Waldron
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The appellant was fined in the Waldron municipal court for having failed to stop for a red traffic light. Upon trial de novo in the circuit court the jury returned a verdict of guilty and imposed a $25 fine. This appeal is evidently prosecuted as a matter of principle.
The appellant asserts, although the record does not clearly show, that the trial in the municipal court consisted of this statement by the municipal judge: “The officer is going to say that you did run the light, you will say you did not. I will find you guilty, and I know that you will appeal. I do…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Harrell v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Hogan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.